Friday, 9 November 2007

Brilliant Ancestors

After watching the movie Bhool Bhullaiya, I was bowled over. Though it is not the best entertainer, it contained an extra-ordinary message. The message appeared very subtly interwoven with the story. And the message was simple - our ancestors were brilliant! So many people believe that spirits (or Gods/Ghosts) capture people and make them behave extra-ordinarily (like it happens to Vidya Balan, people assume that the spirit of the dancer has captured her). Whereas the truth is that it is actually a psychological illness. If you have noticed, the remedy applied by Akshay Kumar in the movie, was to make Vidya Balan believe (in her excited state) that the demands of the spirit have been fulfilled ( i.e. the dancer has killed the king). This is exactly what people do when they think a ghost/God has captured a human. It is a common sight at the various religious, especially in Maharashtra. They are no psychiatrists, they are simpletons following the directions passed on over generations by our ancestors.

I have been audience to a few such acts personally. During those acts, the spirits' demands were not as outrageous as in the movie. All they asked for was small things like stuff to eat, or clothes or sometimes a bit of jewellery. Giving it to them is actually a scientific solution to the psychological disorder. Giving it a form of divinity, is the act of our brilliant ancestors who found it easier to make people believe it's the act of spirits rather than explaining to them all about psychology. Similar example can also be found in the movie Lage Raho Munnabhai. Munna seems to talk to the spirit of Gandhiji, which is later proved to be a psychological illness. Maybe this is what happens to all the people who claim they've seen a ghost/God.

Our ancestors (Indian) were very smart people, though not very farsighted I would say. Whenever a new idea or concept is presented to people, it is found that there is an inertia that resists any change of their mindset, irrespective of who is presenting it. The facts that are most readily accepted are those pertaining God or religious customs.

Most of the earlier sages or holy men were actually very learned people. They studied mathematics, economics, politics, medicine, etc. During their age, education was restricted to a privileged few and people did not have access to mass communication systems like TV, newspaper or the internet. So, there was little exchange of ideas and the majority of people were generations away from these sages, as far as their knowledge of such subjects was concerned.

These sages invoked the power or God to solve the problems of people and thereby circumvented the inertia of people to accept the solution. This they did in a very interesting manner. A very good example is the disease of chicken pox. It was found that the leaves of neem plant cured chicken pox. The sages could not explain this to people as the people lacked the level of education required for understanding it. So, the sages invoked the power of God, they told people that when a person is suffering from chicken pox, a particular Goddess captures his/her body. To pacify her, the person should be bathed with hot water containing neem leaves. That was all that was required! People accepted the solution as it came from the sages who were virtually the authority to define God's will.

This is example goes a long way in bringing out the reason for existence of most religious customs. Anything that was difficult to explain to the people was impressed upon them by invoking the power of Gods. A lot of such examples can be found in many religions. E.g. The namaz of muslims includes quite a few yogic poses which help people in staying fit. People who offer namaz 5 times a day stay fitter than those who don't (assuming rest all things are same). Most importantly, maybe the concept of God was supported by these sages simply because it helps people develop psychologically and socially. God gives humans the security, the strength, the confidence they need as well as keeps their actions in check by using the carrot of heaven and the stick of hell!

Whatever it is, our ancestors were brilliant because they found the easiest way to make people do the right things. But, like other systems, even this system is not ideal. All the sages were not necessarily philanthropists. Many must have used this system for their own personal goals of power, glory, money, etc. So, we see many meaningless or illogical rituals or customs. Also as time moves on, the solutions to problems change and today's experts are no sages so, they cannot invoke the power of Gods to present a solution for any problem. Hence, it is now more difficult to impress new solutions to older problems on people. The methodology of the ancestors is proving to be the greatest bane of today's experts. So, the ancestors were not very farsighted. Filling the gap in education would have ensured a different level of maturity in people. But, with the spread of modern education, this scenario is changing and changing for the better, I think.

Agree with me? Disagree with me? Leave a comment…..

Author: Vj

Tuesday, 6 November 2007

Explain thy actions

Malcolm Gladwell, the famous author of 'blink!' and 'The Tipping Point', in his seminar delivered at PopCast!, argued that whenever people are asked to make a choice and give a reason for it, an astounding majority make the wrong decision or rather, they make a decision that is simple to justify. The need for justification plays a role in our decision process!!!

To elaborate this, he cited the example of Aeron chair (regarded as the best selling and best designed ergonomic chair, find out more on http://www.hermanmiller.com/CDA/SSA/Product/0,,a10-c440-p8,00.html). When the chair was developed, all market survey indicated that it will be a huge disaster but, it turned out to be a best seller within 4 years. The people who had criticized the chair initially, appreciated it and bought it in volumes! How come they changed their opinion from one extreme to the other? Well, according to Malcolm, it was not a change at all. Since, the people had to rate the chair initially, they had to comment i.e. they had to think. This made them take the wrong decision whereas actually, they liked the chair. The chair happened to be radically different at the time it was launched so, it was easier to say I don't like the chair because its so much….. not like a regular chair! He strongly advocated that when people are made to explain what their preference is, they usually gravitate negatively towards the other side and express a preference that is actually opposite of their actual preference.

Another example is of an experiment conducted on a group of students. Each student was asked to pick a portrait out of a bulk of portraits. The portraits were of 2 types. Half the students were asked to justify why they chose a particular portrait. Whereas the other half was not asked to explain. It was observed that the group that did not have to explain their decision chose quite a few abstract portraits while the group that had to explain their decision chose almost no abstract portraits. Also, when a feedback was taken, most of the students of the group that had to justify their decision were unhappy with their selection whereas a majority of the students from the other group were satisfied with their selection.

Think about it for a second. Has it ever happened to you? Were you ever asked to justify why a particular car/house/any article is your favorite and you had a tough time doing it? Maybe yes, maybe not. Or maybe this is just one side of the story, there could be more to the other side also……. Whatever it is, just be alert the next time decide on anything and leave a comment if you observe anything fishy……

To see the video you can visit http://www.poptech.org/popcasts/ It is available for download, free of cost. (Check out many other interesting videos on the same site).

Agree with me? Disagree with me? Leave a comment…….